Author Archive

Lyndsey Lovinger

---

Can Exercise Lead to a Better Brain?

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

At Camp Shane weight loss camps for kids, we try to make physical fitness fun for everyone, and we offer all types of events and activities designed to get even the most reluctant camper involved. We know that exercise is crucial to effective weight loss and optimum physical health, but now scientists have shown that there is also an essential relationship between exercise and building a better brain.

In the quest to make ourselves smarter, there may now be an easy-to-achieve, scientifically-proven way to become more intelligent: Go for a walk or a swim. For more than a decade, neuroscientists and physiologists have been gathering evidence of the beneficial relationship between exercise and brainpower. But the newest findings make it clear that this isn’t just any relationship; it is THE relationship. Using sophisticated technologies to examine the workings of individual neurons – and the makeup of brain matter itself – scientists in just the past few months have discovered that exercise appears to build a brain that resists physical shrinkage and enhance cognitive flexibility.

Last year a team of researchers led by Justin S. Rhodes, a psychology professor at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois, gathered four groups of mice and set them into four distinct living arrangements. One group lived in a world of sensual and gustatory plenty, dining on nuts, fruits and cheeses, their food occasionally dusted with cinnamon, all of it washed down with variously flavored waters. Their “beds” were colorful plastic igloos occupying one corner of the cage. Neon-hued balls, plastic tunnels, nibble-able blocks, mirrors and seesaws filled other parts of the cage. Group 2 had access to all of these “enrichments”, plus small disc-shaped running wheels in their cages. Group 3’s cages held no embellishments, and they received standard kibble. Group 4’s homes contained the running wheels, but no other toys or treats.

All the animals completed a series of cognitive tests at the start of the study and were injected with a substance that allows scientists to track changes in their brain structures. Over the next few months, they then they ran, played, or (if their environment was un-enriched) lolled about in their cages. Afterwards, Rhodes’s team put the mice through the same cognitive tests and examined brain tissues.

“Only one thing had mattered,” Rhodes says, “and that’s whether they had a running wheel.” Animals who exercised, whether or not they any enrichments in their cages, had healthier brains and performed significantly better on cognitive tests than the other mice. Animals that didn’t exercise, no matter how enriched their world was, did not improve their brainpower in complex, lasting ways.It turned out that the toys and tastes, no matter how stimulating, had not improved the animals’ brains.

Why would exercise build brainpower in ways that thinking might not? Like all muscles and organs, the brain is a tissue, and its function declines with underuse and age. Beginning in our late 20s, most of us will lose about 1% annually of the volume of the hippocampus, a key portion of the brain related to memory and certain types of learning. Exercise seems to slow or reverse the brain’s physical decay, much as it does with muscles. Even more encouraging, scientists also found that exercise jump-starts neurogenesis – the creation of new brain cells. Mice and rats that ran for a few weeks generally had about twice as many new neurons as sedentary animals. Like other muscles, their brains were bulking up.

Additionally, exercise seems to make neurons nimble.  When researchers in a separate study had mice run a maze, the animals’ brains readily wired many new neurons into their existing network. Those neurons only fired during running, and also when the animals practiced cognitive skills, like exploring unfamiliar environments. In the mice, running created brain cells that could multitask.

Research suggests that exercise prompts increases in something called brain-derived neurotropic factor, or BDNF, a substance that strengthens cells and axons, and fortifies the connections among neurons and sparks neurogenesis. Scientists have found that after workouts, most people display higher BDNF levels in their bloodstreams.

Few if any researchers think that more BDNF explains all of the brain changes associated with exercise. Any whether any type of exercise will produce these desirable effects is another unanswered and intriguing issue. “It’s not clear if the activity has to be endurance exercise,” says the psychologist and neuroscientist Arthur F. Kramer, director of the Beckman Institute at the University of Illinois and a pre-eminent expert on exercise and the brain. A limited number of past studies have found cognitive benefits among older people who lifted weights for a year and did not otherwise exercise, but most studies to date, (and all animal experiments) have involved running or other aerobic activities.

Whatever the activity, though, an emerging message from the most recent science is that exercise does not need to be exhausting to be effective for the brain. When a group of 120 older men and women were assigned to walking or stretching programs for a major 2011 study, the walkers wound up with larger hippocampi after a year, while the stretchers lost volume to normal atrophy. The walkers also displayed higher levels of BDNF in their bloodstreams than the stretching group, and performed better on cognitive tests.

Source: www.nytimes.com, How Exercise Could Lead to a Better Brain

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/magazine/how-exercise-could-lead-to-a-better-brain.html?pagewanted=all

Share
Google Buzz
Email This Post Email This Post

Nutrition News: 15 Biggest Food Myths

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

It is easy to become overwhelmed with the amount of information available today about healthy diet, weight loss, and nutrition. Fitness trends make their way into the scene, and just as quickly disappear. Fad diets promising weight loss constantly appear and fade away. But when it comes to eating healthily, there really are just a few rules to follow, and some “rules” that are purely myth. Camp Shane, a leading  weight loss camp for kids, gives our campers the tools they need to make healthy diet choices. Check out the 15 biggest nutrition myths from “Fitbie” online.

Myth #1: High fructose corn syrup is worse than table sugar High fructose has gotten lots of media attention recently for being unhealthier than your average table sugar. Here are the facts: HFCS and table sugar are both built with roughly a 50-50 blend of two sugars, fructose and glucose. Most likely, your body cannot tell one from the other. However, since HFCS is very cheap, many foods (even ones you might not suspect) are made with the product and it may be affecting your health in ways not yet fully understood by the scientific community. As a rule, the less sugar you eat, the better. The best solution is to minimize the amount of HFCS by reading the ingredient list on nutrition labels.

Myth #2: Sea salt is a healthier version of regular salt

Table salt comes from a mine and contains about 2,300 milligrams of sodium per teaspoon. Sea salt comes from evaporated seawater and also contains about 2,300 milligrams of sodium. That makes both of them roughly identical. Sea salt does contains compounds like magnesium and iron, but they exist only in trace amounts, meaning you would have to ingest extremely high and potentially dangerous levels of sodium to obtain a meaningful dose. Table salt is regularly fortified with iodine, which plays an important role in regulating the hormones in your body. Sea salt provides virtually zero iodine. The solution: don’t rush to switch out your table salt for sea salt, as table salt may have the slight edge. In general, it’s best to avoid excess sodium in your diet altogether.

Myth #3: Energy drinks are less harmful than soda

Energy drinks, such as Red Bull and Monster, attempt to boost your energy with B vitamins, herbal extracts, and amino acids. However, their big ingredient is sugar. A 16-ounce can delivers as much as 280 calories of pure sugar, which is about 80 calories more than the same amount of Pepsi. A University of Maryland study also found energy drinks to be 11% more corrosive to your teeth than regular soda. The only proven, significant energy boost comes from caffeine. The best energy boost is a cup of coffee.

Myth #4: Diet soda is harmless

Diet soda is sweet due to artificial sweeteners, and the obesity-research community is becoming increasingly aware that these sweeteners can lead to hard-to-control food urges later in the day. A University of Texas study found that people who consume just three diet sodas per week were more than 40% more likely to be obese. Try to wean yourself off soda altogether by switching to carbonated water and flavoring with lemon, cucumber, or fresh herbs.

Myth #5: Low-fat foods are better for you

In food marketing lingo, “low fat” is often synonymous with “loaded with salt and cheap carbohydrates.” For example, Smucker’s Reduced Fat Peanut Butter contains a fast-digesting carbohydrate called maltodextrin to replace the fat taken out. That is not going to help you lose weight. A New England Journal of Medicine study found that over a 2-year span, people on low-carb diets lost 62 percent more body weight than those trying to cut fat. Be careful when purchasing foods that claim to be “low fat” and check the nutrition label to see that it’s not loaded with carbohydrates.

Myth #6: “Trans-fat free” foods are actually trans-fat free

If a food contains no more than .5 grams of trans-fat per serving, they are allowed by FDA guidelines to claim that it has 0 grams of trans-fat. However, due to a link to heart disease, the World Health Organization advises people to keep trans-fat intake as low as possible, maxing out at about 1 gram per 2,000 calories consumed. If you’re not aware that many foods have almost half a gram of trans-fat, you could be exceeding that number every day. The American Journal of Health Promotion recently published an article urging the FDA to rethink its lax regulations. Meanwhile, avoid all foods with “partially hydrogenated oil” (meaning trans-fat) on their ingredients list.

Myth #7: Foods labeled “natural” are healthier

The FDA does not make a serious effort to control the use of the word “natural” on nutrition labels. For example, 7UP advertises that it is made with “100% Natural Flavors”. In reality, the soda is sweetened with an unnaturally high dose of high fructose corn syrup. Other “natural” label abuses include Natural Cheetos (made with maltodextrin and disodium phosphate), and Post’s “natural advantage” Raisin Bran, which uses excessive sugar and corn syrup. Again, read nutrition labels very carefully and don’t be fooled into paying more for these so-called “premium” foods!

Myth #8: Egg yolks raise your cholesterol

Yes, egg yolks do contain dietary cholesterol. However, research has proven that dietary cholesterol has almost nothing to do with serum cholesterol, the substance in your blood. Researchers at Wake Forest University reviewed more than 30 egg studies and found no link between egg consumption and heart disease. Another study in Saint Louis found that eating eggs for breakfast could decrease your calorie intake for the remainder of the day. An added bonus is that eggs are not very expensive and available in any supermarket, so be sure to stock up the next time you are grocery shopping.

Myth #9: Eating junk food helps battle stress

We all deal with stress in different ways. Many choose to battle their stress by eating junk food. It can be momentarily comforting, but a study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry found that people who consumed the most highly processed foods were 58% more likely to be depressed than those who ate the least. The next time you’re feeling stressed, find a healthy snack like peanut butter and Triscuits to satisfy the craving.

Myth #10: Chocolate is bad for you

Cocoa is a plant-based food replete with flavonoids that increase blood flow and release feel-good endorphins. It also contains a healthy type of saturated fat called stearic acid, which research has shown can increase your good HDL cholesterol. Here is the catch: when most people think of chocolate, their mind jumps to milk chocolate, which has far more sugar than actual cocoa. Try dark chocolate instead, specifically, those versions that tell you exactly how much cocoa they contain. Aim for a chocolate bar with 60 percent cocoa, but the more cocoa it contains, the greater the health effects.

Myth #11: Granola is good for you

Granola is a very sneaky food that seems like it should be healthy. Although it is made of oats (which ARE good for you), they are blanketed in sugar and baked in oil. After processing, granola is likely to contain more fat and sugar than a bowl of regular cereal. The best bet is to stick with a reasonably healthy cereal, or (better yet) switch to oatmeal.

Myth #12: Bananas are the best source of potassium

Potassium keeps your nerves and muscles working efficiently, and can also blunt sodium’s effect on blood pressure. A 2009 study found that a 2:1 ratio of potassium to sodium could halve your risk of heart disease. The average American consumes about 3,400 milligrams of sodium each day, so your goal should be 6,800 milligrams of daily potassium. It is highly unlikely you will reach that mark, and never with bananas alone. One banana has 422 milligrams and 105 calories. Some alternate sources of potassium that also have fewer calories are:

  • Potato- 80 calories in half a medium spud
  • Apricots- 80 calories in 5 whole fruits
  • Cantaloupe- 55 calories in 1 cup of cubes
  • Broccoli- 50 calories in 1 full stalk
  • Sun-dried tomatoes- 35 calories in a quarter cup

Myth #13: Oranges are the best source of Vitamin C

Vitamin C is an antioxidant that plays a host of important roles in your body, and also boosts the immune system. It strengthens skin by helping to build collagen, improves mood by increasing the flow of norepinephrine, and bolsters metabolic efficiency by helping transport fat cells into the body’s enery-burning mitochondria. However, the body cannot create or store this vitamin, so you need to provide a constant supply. An orange is the most famous vitamin-C food, and although it is a good source, it’s not the best. An orange has 70 calories and 70 micrograms of vitamin C. Other sources with the same amount of vitamin C and fewer calories are:

  • Papaya- 50 calories in ¾ cup
  • Brussel’s sprouts- 40 calories in 1 cup
  • Strawberries- 40 calories in 7 large fruits
  • Broccoli- 25 calories in ½ stalk
  • Red Bell Pepper- 20 calories in ½ medium pepper

Myth #14: Organic is always better

Organic products are often better, but not always. In fact, organic produce is almost nutritionally identical to its conventional counterpart. The issue here is pesticide exposure, which some studies have linked to an increased risk of obesity. However, many conventionally grown fruits and vegetables are very low in pesticides. For example, the conventional onion has the lowest pesticide load of 45 fruits and vegetables tested by the Environmental Working Group. Other safe-to-eat conventional produce include avocados, sweet corn, and pineapple. In general, conventional fruits and vegetables with impermeable skins are safe to buy, while organic produce like celery, peaches, apples, and blueberries are better.

Myth #15: Meat is bad for you

Meat is a great source of protein – pork, beef, and lamb are among the world’s best sources. A Danish study found that dieting with 25 percent of calories from protein can help you lose twice as much weight as dieting with 12 percent protein. Also, Vitamin B12 is only prevalent in animal-based foods. B12 is essential to your body’s ability to decode DNA and build red blood cells. Don’t be concerned that meat will increase your risk for heart disease. A Harvard University review examined 20 studies and found that meat’s link to heart disease exists only with processed meats like bacon, sausage and deli cuts. Stick with unprocessed meats, those that are not smoked, cured, or chemically preserved.

Share
Google Buzz
Email This Post Email This Post

Lose Weight with Whole Grains

Tuesday, April 17th, 2012

At Camp Shane, a leading weight loss camp for kids, we educate our campers on nutrition so they can make healthy diet choices when they return home.

Lots of people are starting to make the switch from white bread to wheat. But why are whole grains a healthier choice for a weight loss diet than other sources of carbohydrates?

There are three parts of a grain: the endosperm, bran, and germ. The bran is the shell of the grain, and protects it from damage. It is made mostly of fiber. The germ can be best described as the seed, and it contains all the vitamins and minerals. The endosperm is the starch, and provides energy. When a grain is processed, the bran and the germ are thrown away, leaving only the starchy, sugary part of the grain. The grain is then bleached to give it the white color.

This happened in America for years, until people started developing B vitamin deficiencies, such as beriberi, pellagra, and neural tube defects. At that point, there was a major movement to start “enriching” the processed grains. This meant that the companies that processed the grains started adding spray on vitamins. This change helped with deficiencies, but still did not make white flour any more fibrous.

Another issue that arises with bleached, enriched grains is food additives. Many brands of white breads contain high fructose corn syrup to make it sweeter, and a high salt content to make it more shelf-stable. Although it may taste better and lasts longer in your cupboard than other breads, it is not the best choice for your healthy diet.

All in all, whole grains keep you full for longer because your body uses the energy more slowly. The added sugars and the lack of fiber in white bread gives you an initial sugar high and crash after, leaving you hungry for more calories soon after eating. If you eat whole grains, you are less likely to over consume, which can lead to weight gain and obesity. But always remember to check the label, because some whole wheat breads aren’t 100%, and can contain high fructose corn syrup, too!

Written by Amanda Yazbek, Nutritionist at Camp Shane weight loss camp for children

Share
Google Buzz
Email This Post Email This Post

The Effect of Sugar on Weight Loss

Wednesday, April 11th, 2012

As a leading weight loss camp for kids, Camp Shane does not obsess over dieting – we work with our campers on learning about nutrition so they can make healthy diet choices at home.

One of the leading causes of weight gain for most Americans is the over consumption of added sugar. Statistics state that the average American obtains over 20 teaspoons of sugar which rounds out to about 400 calories.

Junk Food in School

According to the USDA guidelines of the American Heart Association, 20 teaspoons of sugar per day exceeds recommendations. These added sugars include any form of sweetener that is loaded with calories and not naturally found in nature. Fruit sugar, also known as fructose, is a type of sugar that is converted into energy differently and does not present immediate health concerns. These are okay to include in your healthy diet.

Most sugar added to food unnaturally is in the form of sucrose and should not be included in your weight loss diet. It is lurking in most desserts and sports drinks, as well as all sodas. Sugar does not benefit the body in any way; it only adds useless calories which will ultimately lead to weight gain and even obesity. Being overweight or obese is also a contributing factor for many diseases.

The main role of sugar is to boost flavor and appeal to most Americans’ taste buds. This is why it is marketed and formulated in most junk foods, along with those foods you would not normally associate as sweet like ketchup. Steer clear of cookies, cakes and snack foods with more than seven grams of added sugar, and limit your intake of sweetened beverages. This will ensure you maintain a healthy weight and decrease your chances of heart disease and related diseases.

Written by Adrienne Pellechia, Nutritionist at Camp Shane weight loss camp for kids

Share
Google Buzz
Email This Post Email This Post

Childhood Obesity News: Most U.S. Schools Don’t Require P.E. Class

Monday, April 9th, 2012

Childhood obesity has more than tripled in the past 30 years, so at a time when children need activity more than ever, it is shocking to learn that most schools do not even require physical education class or recess for their students. Some activity is better than no activity, and overweight and obese children will just continue to gain weight if immediate measures are not taken.

Something just does not add up here: one in three U.S. kids is overweight or obese, but only six states – Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Illinois, and Iowa – adhere to standards from the National Association of Sports and Physical Education that require school children to participate in 150 minutes a week of physical education. Only three states – Delaware, Virginia, and Nebraska – have 20 minutes of mandatory elementary school recess a day.

This is another example of not doing something unless you’re required to. Of the group of schools surveyed, twenty-four states and 67 percent of school districts had no P.E. policies. Regarding recess, 64 percent of school districts had no policy at all. Researchers also found a significant either-or effect; schools that met the recess standards were less likely to meet the P.E. guidelines, and vice versa.

Maybe you’re not surprised to hear this news about so few schools requiring P.E. and recess. After all, hours are limited, and budget cuts put increased pressure on academics. Physical activity gets pushed to the bottom of the priority list for many districts.

Sandy Slater, an assistant professor of health policy and administration at the University of Illinois at Chicago, says it’s a mistake to overlook physical activity in schools because studies have identified a link between increased physical activity and academic achievement. “Increasing the amount of physical activity that kids have during the day is not necessarily going to hurt overall academic achievement,” she said.

Dr. Kristine Madsen of the University of California, San Francisco, suggests that “lack of physical activity may be a far greater health problem than obesity.”

So what is the solution? Should schools be required to offer P.E. class and recess on a national scale? Madsen proposes levying a tax on sugary beverages and junk food. “The solution is not limited to the local, state or national level but rather, the solution rests with decision makers at each level,” she said. “We must work together to advocate for our nation’s greatest resource – our youth.”

It’s hard to imagine a school day without gym class OR recess, but it seems to be becoming more common as most schools focus on the academic side of things to increase test scores and avoid budget cuts. Increasing academic achievement is noble, but physical activity is imperative to a child’s well-being and eventual healthy lifestyle.

Do you feel that schools should require P.E. class or recess? Or should it be the parent’s sole responsibility to see to it that their child gets some form of exercise each day? Do you believe that the amount of physical activity done in gym class even counts as enough exercise? We’d love to hear your personal opinions on this one!

Sources: healthland.time.com Childhood Obesity: Most U.S. Schools Don’t Require P.E. Class or Recess; cdc.gov Centers of Disease Control and Prevention: Child Obesity Facts

Share
Google Buzz
Email This Post Email This Post